Hygiene kit distribution and use in humanitarian response: summary of information from a systematic review and key informant interviews

Travis Yates; Marta Domini; Juliemarie Vander Burg; Daniele Lantagne

doi:10.3362/1756-3488.21-00008

Hygiene kit distribution and use in humanitarian response: summary of information from a systematic review and key informant interviews

Travis Yates | Marta Domini | Juliemarie Vander Burg | Daniele Lantagne

Hygiene kits are commonly distributed in humanitarian emergencies to provide dignity and safety, yet remain under-researched. We aimed to close evidence gaps by completing a systematic review and key informant interviews (KII) to assess current practice in hygiene kits distributions. Fourteen KIIs were conducted and >5,000 documents were screened, with nine meeting inclusion criteria. Existing evidence highlights that reported use of hygiene kit items is high, and standardization, beneficiary involvement in kit design, and post-distribution monitoring are needed. Emergent themes from KIIs were: hygiene kit design; logistics/procurement; field appropriateness/feedback; and recommendations. Unexpectedly, menstrual health management (MHM) and market-based programming (MBP) dominated the literature. Overall, hygiene kit distributions are governed by ‘best practice’ rather than ‘evidence base’. This limited evidence base is stark compared to more robust evidence for market-based programming. As a common definition of hygiene kits was lacking, we developed and present a hygiene kit typology. We recommend hygiene kit programming: 1) understands local context, cultural norms, and preferences by incorporating beneficiary consultation and feedback; 2) ensures item type and quantity is what beneficiaries need; 3) ensures hygiene kits are context-appropriate, and considers concurrent MHM and/or MBP programming; and 4) works with coordination mechanisms to harmonize kit materials, delivery, and monitoring.

Abbott, L., Bailey, B., Karasawa, Y., Louis, D., McNab, S., Patel, D., López, C., Posada, R., Rikha, S., Saba, C. and Vaval, L. (2011) Evaluation of UNFPA’s Provision of Dignity Kits in Humanitarian and Post-Crisis Settings [online] <http://web2.unfpa.org/public/about/oversight/evaluations/docDownload.unfpa;jsessionid=F6242023F250DF6F176594D347FCC796?docId=68> [accessed 30 September 2021].

Ahmed, L., Malik, Z. and Nawab, B. (2012) Humanitarian Support to Conflict and Flood-affected Populations in Pakistan, Action Against Hunger, Paris.

Battistin, F. (2016) Impact Evaluation of the Multipurpose Cash Assistance Programme, Lebanon Cash Consortium, Save the Children, International Rescue Committee, Beirut, Lebanon.

Bedran, M. (2018) Independent Final Evaluation of the Project: WASH, MHCP and NFI Assistance to Newly Accessible Populations [online], Action Against Hunger, Paris <https://www.alnap.org/help-library/independent-final-evaluation-of-the-project-wash-mhcp-and-nfi-assistance-to-newly> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Boulineaud, M. (2017) Cash or in-Kind? Why Not Both? Response analysis lessons from multimodal programming [online], Technical and Operational Performance Support (TOPS) Program, Washington, DC <https://www.crs.org/sites/default/files/tools-research/calp-response-analysis-web.pdf> [accessed 30 September 2021].

Brady, C. and Creti, P. (2010) CaLP Case Study: Shop vouchers for hygiene kits in Port-au-Prince, Haiti [online] <https://www.calpnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/CaLP_Haiti_Case_Study.pdf> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters CRED (no date) EM-DAT: International Disaster Database [online] <https://www.cred.be/> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Connolly, M.A., Gayer, M., Ryan, M., Salama, P., Spiegel, P. and Heymann, D. (2004) ‘Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges’, Lancet 364(9449): 1974–83 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17481-3>.

CRS (2017) E-vouchers in Conflict Situations Approaches and Lessons Learned from northeast Nigeria [online], Catholic Relief Services, Baltimore <https://www.crs.org/sites/default/files/tools-research/e-vouchers_in_conflict_situations_crs_nigeria_case_study_0.pdf> [accessed 14 October 2021].

D’Mello-Guyett, L., Greenland, K., Bonneville, S., D’hondt, R., Mashako, M., Gorski, A., Verheyen, D., Van den Bergh, R., Maes, P., Checchi, F. and Cumming, O. (2020) ‘Distribution of hygiene kits during a cholera outbreak in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo: a process evaluation’, Conflict and Health 14(1): 51 <https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-020-00294-w>.

Domini, M., Yates, T., Guidotti, S., Win, L. and Lantagne, D. (2021) ‘Results from implementing a cohesive strategy and standardized monitoring programme for hygiene kit distribution in Myanmar’, Waterlines 40(1): 3–22 <https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.20-00011>.

Doocy, S. and Tappis, H. (2017) ‘Cash-based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review’, Campbell Systematic Reviews 13(1): 1–200 <https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.17>.

Ferron, S. (2017) Enabling Access to Non-Food Items in an Emergency Response: A Review of Oxfam Programmes [online], Oxfam, Oxford, UK <https://doi.org/10.21201/2017.0292>.

Gartley, M., Valeh, P., de Lange, R., DiCarlo, S., Viscusi, A., Lenglet, A. and Fesselet, J. (2013) ‘Uptake of household disinfection kits as an additional measure in response to a cholera outbreak in urban areas of Haiti’, Journal of Water and Health 11(4): 623–8 <https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2013.050>.

Harvey, P. and Pavanello, S. (2018) Multi-purpose cash and sectoral outcomes. A review of Evidence and Learning [online], UNHCR <unhcr.org/5b28c4157.pdf> [accessed 30 September 2021].

Higgins, J., Churchill, R., Lasserson, T., Chandler, J. and Tovey, D. (2013) Methodological Standards for the Conduct of New Cochrane Intervention Reviews (Version 2.3) [online] <http://www.editorial-unit.cochrane.org/mecir> [accessed 30 September 2021].

House, S., Mahon, T. and Cavill, S. (2012) Menstrual Hygiene Matters: Hygiene around the World [online], WaterAid, London <https://www.susana.org/_resources/documents/default/3-2210-21-1426498269.pdf> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Juillard, H. and Opu, M.I. (2014) Scoping Study: Emergency Cash Transfer Programming in the WASH and Shelter Sectors, pp. 1–48, CaLP [online] <https://www.calpnetwork.org/publication/scoping-study-emergency-cash-transfer-programming-in-the-wash-and-shelter-sectors/> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Kohrt, B.A., Mistry, A., Anand, N., Beecroft, B. and Nuwayhid, I. (2019) ‘Health research in humanitarian crises: an urgent global imperative’, BMJ Global Health 4(6): 1–8 <https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001870>.

Le Seve, M.D. and Mason, N. (2019) Building Evidence to Inform the Effective Use of Cash and Voucher Assistance in Emergency Sanitation and Hygiene Programming, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London <https://www.alnap.org/help-library/building-evidence-to-inform-the-effective-use-of-cash-and-voucher-assistance-in> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Otálora, C.G. and Jacob, J. (2019) Guidance on Market Based Programming for Humanitarian WASH Practitioners [online], Global WASH Cluster, Geneva <https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/node/15664/pdf/gwc_mbp_wash_guidance_190725.pdf> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Oxfam (2011) Women’s Menstrual Hygiene Needs in Emergencies, Oxfam, Oxford, UK.

Oxfam (2015) ‘Market Analysis Application in WASH Response’, Oxfam, Oxford.

Oxfam (no date) ‘Using market analysis to support humanitarian wash programming’ Oxfam, Oxford, pp. 1–4.

Peterson, E. (1998) ‘The effect of soap distribution on diarrhoea: Nyamithuthu Refugee Camp’, International Journal of Epidemiology 27(3): 520–4 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/27.3.520>.

Post Distribution Monitoring Report Hygiene Kit funded by IMC (2014) [online], NRC <https://reliefweb.int/report/jordan/post-distribution-monitoring-report-hygiene-kit-funded-imc> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Ramesh, A., Blanchet, K., Ensink, J. and Roberts, B. (2015) ‘Evidence on the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions on health outcomes in humanitarian crises: a systematic review’, PloS One 10(9): e0124688 <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124688>.

Robinson, A. and Obrecht, A. (2016) Improving Menstrual Hygiene Management in Emergencies: IFRC’s MHM kit, HIF/ALNAP Case Study, ODI/ALNAP, London.

Roelen, K., Devereux, S., Adato, M., Martorano, B., Palermo, T. and Ragno, L. (2017) How to Make ‘Cash Plus’ Work: Linking Cash Transfers to Services and Sectors, Innocenti Working Paper 2017-10, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.

Rohwerder, B. (2014) Non-food Items (NFIs) and the Needs of Women and Girls in Emergencies, GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1107 [online], Birmingham, UK <http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/HDQ1107.pdf> [accessed 30 September 2021].

Salama, P., Spiegel, P., Talley, L. and Waldman, R. (2004) ‘Lessons learned from complex emergencies over past decade’, Lancet 364(9447): 1801–13 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17405-9>.

Smith, K.F., Goldberg, M., Rosenthal, S., Carlson, L., Chen, J., Chen, C. and Ramachandran, S. (2014) ‘Global rise in human infectious disease outbreaks’, Journal of The Royal Society Interface 11(101): 20140950 <https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0950>.

Smyth, I. (2012) Gender-Sensitive Response and Recovery, Oxfam GB, Oxford, UK.

Sphere Association (2018) The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response, 4th edn, Geneva, Switzerland <https://doi.org/10.3362/9781908176707>.

Spina, A., Beversluis, D., Irwin, A., Chen, A., Nassariman, J., Ahamat, A., Noh, I., Oosterloo, J., Alfani, P., Sang, S., Lenglet, A. and Taylor, D. (2018) ‘Learning from water treatment and hygiene interventions in response to a hepatitis E outbreak in an open setting in Chad’, Journal of Water and Health 16(2): 223–32 <https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2018.258>.

Taylor, D.L., Kahawita, T., Cairncross, S. and Ensink, J. (2015) ‘The impact of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to control cholera: a systematic review’, PLoS ONE 10(8) <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135676>.

Turnbull, M. (2014) Humanitarian Quality Assurance Lebanon: Evaluation of Syria Crisis Response [online], Oxfam, Oxford, UK <https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/humanitarian-quality-assurance-lebanon-evaluation-of-syria-crisis-response-336607/> [accessed 30 September 2021].

UNHCR (2016) Cash Based Interventions for WASH Programmes in Refugee Settings, UNHCR, Geneva, Switzerland.

Vaillancourt, A. (2016) ‘Kit management in humanitarian supply chains’, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 18: 64–71 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.002>.

Venton, C.C., Bailey, S. and Pongracz, S. (2015) Value for Money of Cash Transfers in Emergencies [online] <https://www.calpnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/424-summary-vfm-cash-in-emergencies-report-final.pdf> [accessed 14 October 2021].

Watson, J.T., Gayer, M. and Connolly, M.A. (2007) ‘Epidemics after natural disasters’, Emerging Infectious Diseases 13(1): 1–5 <https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1301.060779>.

Wilbur, J., Torondel, B., Hameed, S., Mahon, T. and Kuper, H. (2019) ‘Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people’, PLoS ONE 14(2): 1–17 <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210974>.

Yates, T., Vujcic, J., Joseph, M., Gallandat, K. and Lantagne, D. (2018a) ‘Efficacy and effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions in emergencies in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review’, Waterlines 37(1): 31–65 <https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.17-00016>.

Yates, T., Vujcic, J., Joseph, M., Gallandat, K. and Lantagne, D (2018b) ‘Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions in outbreak response: a synthesis of evidence’, Waterlines 37(1): 5–30 <https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.17-00015>.