Practical experience testing aspects of market development for city-wide inclusive sanitation

Sanjay Singh; John Sauer

doi:10.3362/1756-3488.19-00009

Practical experience testing aspects of market development for city-wide inclusive sanitation

Achieving effective, city-wide inclusive sanitation service delivery requires coordination of diverse actors in the sanitation value chain as many factors constrain the efficiency and quality of faecal sludge management (FSM). In partnership with government, consumer, and private sector stakeholders in Bihar’s capital city, Patna, PSI India facilitated extensive market analysis, identified the market challenges, and co-developed a market-based urban FSM services ‘ecosystem’ which resulted in the safe collection, treatment, and disposal of over 7 million litres of faecal sludge from more than an estimated 1,500 households over two years, as part of bundled portable toilet cabins and FSM services. The FSM programme Praashadan, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, built trust, improved coordination, and brokered official agreements between tanker operators and government, tested a portable toilet cabin business model to subsidize operation of a faecal sludge treatment plant, and established a call centre and promotional activities to drive customers to the services of a newly formed tanker operators association. Moving forward there is a need to place the work with these market actors into a wider context of a financed, coordinated, city-wide sanitation planning to address technology, R&D, and other constraints that support better business models and allow regular quality FSM services.

Blackett, I., Hawkins, P. and Heymans, C. (2014) The Missing Link in Sanitation Service Delivery: A Review of Fecal Sludge Management in 12 Cities [pdf], Water and Sanitation Program Research Brief 88258 <http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/395181468323975012/pdf/882580PRIORITY0eview0Research0Brief.pdf> [accessed 17 December 2019].

Daudey, L. (2018) ‘The cost of urban sanitation solutions: a literature review’, Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 8(2): 176–95 <https:doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2017.058>.

Diener, S., Semiyaga, S., Niwagaba, C.B., Muspratt, A.M., Gning, J.B., Mbéguéré, M., Ennin, J.E., Zurbrugg, C. and Strande, L. (2014) ‘A value proposition: resource recovery from fecal sludge—can it be the driver for improved sanitation?’ Resources, Conservation and Recycling 88: 32–8 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.005>.

Down to Earth (2016) ‘78% of sewage generated in India remains untreated,’ Down to Earth 6 April [Online] <https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/waste/-78-of-sewage-generated-in-india-remains-untreated--53444> [accessed 18 December 2019].

Fecal Sludge Management (FSM) Toolbox BETA (no date) FSM Toolbox home page [website] <https://www.fsmtoolbox.com/> [accessed 17 December 2019].

Government of Rajastha, Jharkhand (2018) Draft State Policy, Fecal Sludge & Septage Management (FSSM) [pdf] <http://urban.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/raj/udh/organizations/ruidp/MISC/FSSM%20Policy.pdf> [accessed 17 December 2019].

India Sanitation Coalition, IRC WASH, TARU Leading Edge, and WaterAid India (2017) Fecal Sludge and Septage Management (FSSM) in the Sanitation Value [Chain]: Synthesis Document [pdf], Insights series 5 <https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/insights_5_fssm_matters-looking_forward.pdf> [accessed 17 December 2019].

International Water Association (2019) ‘Addis Ababa: sanitation status’ [online] <https://www.iwapublishing.com/news/addis-ababa-sanitation-status> [accessed 17 December 2019].

Jenkins, M.W., Cumming, O. and Cairncross, S. (2015) ‘Pit latrine emptying behavior and demand for sanitation services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12: 2588–611 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302588>.

Kappauf, L., Heyer, A., Makuwa, T. and Titova, Y. (2018) SFD Report, Lusaka, Zambia, Final Report [pdf] <https://www.susana.org/_resources/documents/default/3-3468-7-1541604933.pdf> [accessed 17 December 2019].

Mondal, S., Moniruzzaman, S. and Islam, M.D. (2018) ‘Study on emptying of fecal sludge at selected areas in Khulna City’, Journal of Engineering Science 9(1): 77–84 <https://www2.kuet.ac.bd/JES/images/files/v91/9_JES_165.pdf>.

Odey, E.A., Abo, B.O., Giwa, A.S. and Li, Z. (2019) ‘Fecal sludge management: insights from selected cities in sub-Saharan Africa’, Archives of Environmental Protection 45(2): 50–7 <http://dx.doi.org/10.24425/aep.2019.127984>.

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India (2011) 2011 census data [online] <http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html> [accessed 17 December 2019].

Opel, A. and Bashar, M.K. (2013) ‘Inefficient technology or misperceived demand: the failure of Vacutug based pit-emptying services in Bangladesh’, Waterlines 32(3): 213–20 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2013.022>.

SFD Promotion Initiative (no date) SFD home page [website] <https://sfd.susana.org/> [accessed 17 December 2019].

Sy, J., Warner, R. and Jamieson, J. (2014) Tapping the Markets: Opportunities for Domestic Investments in Water and Sanitation for the Poor [online], World Bank Group, Washington, DC <http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/566761468158387510/Tapping-the-markets-opportunities-for-domestic-investments-in-water-and-sanitation-for-the-poor> [accessed 17 December 2019].

Thakur, P. and Singh, S. (2017) SFD Promotion Initiative: Patna India, Final Report [pdf] <https://www.susana.org/_resources/documents/default/3-2990-7-1519733214.pdf> [accessed 18 December 2019].

USAID Water Team Bureau for Economic Growth, Education and Environment (2018) Water Currents: Citywide Inclusive Sanitation [online], Globalwaters.org <https://www.globalwaters.org/resources/assets/water-currents-citywide-inclusive-sanitation> [accessed 16 December 2019].