Appropriateness of low-cost sewerage for African cities: A questionnaire survey of expert opinion

Guy Norman; Jonathan Chenoweth

doi:10.3362/1756-3488.2009.031

Appropriateness of low-cost sewerage for African cities: A questionnaire survey of expert opinion

A questionnaire survey was circulated via internet-based sanitation forums to assess prevailing expert opinion about the appropriateness of low-cost sewerage for African cities. The questionnaire explored opinions about low-cost, solids-free sewerage (settled sewerage), low-cost, solids-transporting sewerage (simplified sewerage, condominial sewerage), and conventional solids-transporting sewerage. A total of 61 valid responses were obtained: 83 per cent of respondents considered low-cost sewerage to be ‘sometimes’ or ‘often’ appropriate for lower-income districts of African cities, versus 17 per cent who considered it ‘never’ or ‘very rarely’ appropriate. In contrast, only 44 per cent of respondents considered conventional sewerage to be ‘sometimes’ or ‘often’ appropriate. Thus low-cost sewerage is widely viewed as an important option to be given serious consideration during urban sanitation planning in African contexts. However, most respondents consider it appropriate only in certain specific situations, and many express concern about costs and long-term maintainability. Respondents’ comments concerning specific situations in which low-cost sewerage may be appropriate are discussed in detail.

Allen, A. and Hoffmann, P. (2008) ‘Moving down the ladder: Governance and sanitation that works for the urban poor’, paper presented at the IRC Symposium on Urban Sanitation, November 2008, The Netherlands.

AMCOW (African Ministers’ Council on Water) (2008) Can Africa Afford to Miss the Sanitation MDG Target? A Review of the Sanitation and Hygiene Status in 32 Countries, AMCOW, African Development Bank (AfDB), and the World Bank Water and Sanitation Program (WSP).

Eslick, P. and Harrison, J. (2004) A Summary of Lessons and Experiences from the Ethekwini Pilot Shallow Sewer Study, Report Number TT 225/04, Water Research Commission, South Africa.

Holden, R. (2008) ‘Urban sanitation technologies: the challenges of reaching the urban poor’, paper presented at the IRC Symposium ‘Sanitation for the Urban Poor’, Delft, The Netherlands, 19-21 November 2008.

Mara, D. (1996) Low-Cost Sewerage, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

Nance, E. & Ortolano, L. (2007) ‘Community participation in urban sanitation: Experiences in northeastern Brazil’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 26: 284-300.

SuSanA (Sustainable Sanitation Alliance) (2008) ‘Planning for sustainable sanitation’ [online] Version 1.1 (October 2008) http://www.susana.org/lang-en/working-groups/wg06 http://www.susana.org/lang-en/working-groups/wg06

Tayler, K. (2004) ‘Notes on the provision of low-cost sewerage in the context of Africa’, unpublished consultancy report.

UN-Water (2008) ‘Tackling a global crisis: International Year of Sanitation 2008’ [online] http://esa.un.org/iys/index.shtml [accessed 27 July 2009]. http://esa.un.org/iys/index.shtml

Vines, M. & Reed, R. (1991a) Evaluation of Sewered Aqua Privies in Kabushi, Ndola, Zambia, WEDC, Loughborough University, UK.

Vines, M. and Reed, R. (1991b) Evaluation of Sewered Aqua Privies in Matero, Lusaka, Zambia, WEDC, Loughborough University, UK.

Watson, G. (1995) ‘Good sewers cheap? Agency-customer interactions in lowcost urban sanitation in Brazil’, The World Bank, Water and Sanitation Division, Washington DC.

WHO/UNICEF (2006) Meeting the MDG Drinking Water and Sanitation Target: A Mid-term Assessment of Progress, World Health Organization, Geneva.

Wright, A.M. (1997) Toward a Strategic Sanitation Approach: Improving the Sustainability of Urban Sanitation in Developing Countries, UNDP-World Bank Water and Sanitation Program, Washington, DC.

Zaidi, A. (2001) From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project's Low Cost Sanitation Model, WaterAid, London.