Navigating Complexity in International Development
Facilitating sustainable change at scale
International development interventions often fail because development experts assume that our world is linear and straightforward when in reality it is complex, highly dynamic and unpredictable. Things rarely happen in the way that they were planned. The dominance of logical planning models in international development therefore needs to be challenged and replaced by a complexity-based understanding of how change happens.
Navigating Complexity in International Development describes three such processes. Firstly it explores processes of ‘participatory systemic inquiry’ which allow complexity to be collectively seen and understood by stakeholders. Then it outlines two approaches to ‘engagement’: the more structured approach of ‘systemic action research’ and the more organic processes of ‘nurtured emergent development’.
The design and process of each are described clearly, allowing readers to utilize and quickly adapt the ideas to their own situations. They are illustrated through detailed case studies which range from water resource management in Uganda, to agriculture transformation in Egypt and Kenya, to education of girls in Afghanistan, and community responses to conflict in Myanmar. Each builds a detailed picture of how local people and practitioners were able to respond to complexity. The final section looks at issues of power, participation and policy that arise in emergent development processes.
This book is essential reading for planners, practitioners, policy-makers, students, and researchers in international development.
Published: 2015
Pages: 198
eBook: 9781780448510
Hardback: 9781853398513
Paperback: 9781853398520
Navigating Complexity in International Development describes three such processes. Firstly it explores processes of ‘participatory systemic inquiry’ which allow complexity to be collectively seen and understood by stakeholders. Then it outlines two approaches to ‘engagement’: the more structured approach of ‘systemic action research’ and the more organic processes of ‘nurtured emergent development’.
The design and process of each are described clearly, allowing readers to utilize and quickly adapt the ideas to their own situations. They are illustrated through detailed case studies which range from water resource management in Uganda, to agriculture transformation in Egypt and Kenya, to education of girls in Afghanistan, and community responses to conflict in Myanmar. Each builds a detailed picture of how local people and practitioners were able to respond to complexity. The final section looks at issues of power, participation and policy that arise in emergent development processes.
This book is essential reading for planners, practitioners, policy-makers, students, and researchers in international development.
Prelims [Figures, Boxes and Tables | Preface | Acknowledgements | Participatory research projects | Acronyms] | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 Failures of top-down development planning | |||
2 How change happens | |||
3 Catalysing large-scale and sustainable change | |||
4 Seeing the system – participatory systemic inquiry | |||
5 Systemic action research | |||
6 Nurtured Emergent Development | |||
7 Power in transformative change processes | |||
8 Participatory processes in development | |||
9 Implications for development | |||
Index |
‘Burns and Worsley bring an acute understanding of the practitioner’s art and science of development. Intangibles like participation, learning, and network development are at the core of ownership and appropriate action for social change for the poor. Navigating Complexity in International Development unlocks the analysis and dialogue needed to impact sustainable large-scale change. An important contribution for all of us working at the front end of development.’
Steve Hollingworth, President and CEO, Freedom from Hunger
‘This book makes an important case for engaging complex systems, and contributes theory and practice for those researching and intervening to improve the conditions of the poor. It challenges current linear development thinking and offers new methods to effectively engage complexity. Its reflective case studies give rise to a new hope that, with the right approach, development can do better.’
Frank Rijsberman, CEO, CGIAR consortium
‘The timely message of the book then is that we must adopt a collaborative systems orientation anchored in the realities of human participation when dealing with the complexity inherent in international change endeavours.’
Hilary Bradbury, Professor, Division of Management, Oregon Health and Science University, and Editor, Action Research
‘This book presents powerful and persuasive case-based evidence to show how systemic change can be achieved at scale.’
Robert Chambers, Research Associate and Professor Emeritus, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex
‘One of the most thoughtful explorations on the nature of complexity in the development sector. A rare example of a book where the writing is accessible without trivializing the underlying theory. It provides a great platform from which the participative action research and complexity theory communities can develop an exciting new body of both theory and practice.’
Dave Snowden, Founder & Chief Scientific Officer, Cognitive Edge Pte Ltd
‘It is courageous to think in terms of complexity in an era where linear thinking and accountability set the tone. In my experience, working together, coping with power differences, energy, trial, error, reflection and learning, keeping an eye on the parts as well as the whole, using data as well as your senses -- are a few essential elements to make change processes developmental. The book is inspiring since it captures both practice and theoretical reflections.’
Annemiek Jenniskens, ex-director, SNV/Netherlands Development Organisation
‘For too long, development problems have been articulated as technical issues – reframed in ways that remove politics, power imbalances and economics from the analysis. In contrast, this valuable book draws upon original studies to demonstrate the case for taking account of complexity, emphasizing the importance of participatory action and reflection whilst recognizing the need to link bottom-up approaches with wider strategies for social change.’
Marjorie Mayo, Emeritus Professor of Community Development, Goldsmith’s College, University of London
Danny Burns
Danny Burns leads the Participation Research Cluster at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Stuart Worsley
Stuart Worsley is Head of Development Partnerships, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Kenya.
Can We Know Better?
CHAPTER 4: Rigour for complexity
Chambers, Robert
2017
https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449449.004 [Citations: 0]A realist review of community engagement with health research
Adhikari, Bipin
Vincent, Robin
Wong, Geoff
Duddy, Claire
Richardson, Emma
Lavery, James V.
Molyneux, Sassy
Wellcome Open Research, Vol. 4 (2019), Iss. P.87
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2 [Citations: 10]These Photos Were My Life: understanding the impact of participatory photography projects
Fairey, Tiffany
Community Development Journal, Vol. 53 (2018), Iss. 4 P.618
https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsx010 [Citations: 8]Systems Practice: How to Act
Systemic Action Research
Ison, Ray
2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7351-9_11 [Citations: 0]Levelling the Playing Fields in PAR: The Intricacies of Power, Privilege, and Participation in a University–Community–School Partnership
Wood, Lesley
McAteer, Mary
Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 67 (2017), Iss. 4 P.251
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617706541 [Citations: 15]Towards an Inclusive Systemic Evaluation for the SDGs: Gender equality, Environments and Marginalized voices (GEMs)
Stephens, Anne
Lewis, Ellen D.
Reddy, Shravanti
Evaluation, Vol. 24 (2018), Iss. 2 P.220
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018766093 [Citations: 23]Training for Life and Healing: The Systemic Empowerment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Men and Women Through Vocational Education and Training
Stephens, Anne
Monro, Davena
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, Vol. 48 (2019), Iss. 2 P.179
https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2018.5 [Citations: 6]Everyday action research for complex times: A peacebuilder’s guide
Pace, Marie
Action Research, Vol. 19 (2021), Iss. 1 P.56
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750320905898 [Citations: 1]Visions, promises and understandings of development around Kenya’s Masinga reservoir
Clelland, William
Development Policy Review, Vol. 39 (2021), Iss. 6 P.990
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12536 [Citations: 2]Reclaiming Logic Modeling for Evaluation: A Theory of Action Framework
Woodland, Rebecca H.
Mazur, Rebecca
American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 45 (2024), Iss. 3 P.326
https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140231224495 [Citations: 0]Can We Know Better?
CHAPTER 5: Power, participation, and knowledge: knowing better together
Chambers, Robert
2017
https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449449.005 [Citations: 0]How being appreciative creates change – theory in practice from health and social care in Scotland
Sharp, Cathy
Dewar, Belinda
Barrie, Karen
Meyer, Julienne
Action Research, Vol. 16 (2018), Iss. 2 P.223
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750316684002 [Citations: 12]Multi‐Stakeholder Initiatives for Sustainable Development Goals: The Importance of Interlocutors
Fowler, Alan
Biekart, Kees
Public Administration and Development, Vol. 37 (2017), Iss. 2 P.81
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1795 [Citations: 51]Non-governmental development organisations’ sustainability, partnership, and resourcing: futuristic reflections on a problematic trialogue
Fowler, Alan
Development in Practice, Vol. 26 (2016), Iss. 5 P.569
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2016.1188883 [Citations: 22]Second-order Learning in Developmental Evaluation
Concluding Remarks
Mitchell, Andrew
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99371-3_5 [Citations: 0]Rethinking Food and Agriculture
Knowledge systems for inclusively responsible food and agriculture
Chambers, Robert
2021
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816410-5.00016-5 [Citations: 5]Getting beneath the surface in program planning, monitoring and evaluation: Learning from use of participatory action research and theory of change in the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems
Apgar, J Marina
Allen, Will
Albert, Joelle
Douthwaite, Boru
Paz Ybarnegaray, Rodrigo
Lunda, Jeston
Action Research, Vol. 15 (2017), Iss. 1 P.15
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750316673879 [Citations: 26]Action Learning and Action Research: Genres and Approaches
Chapter 9: Designing and Facilitating Systemic Action Research at Scale
Burns, Danny
2019
https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-537-520191013 [Citations: 1]Rethinking theories of change in the light of enactive cognitive science: Contributions to community‐scale local sustainability initiatives
Mitchell, Andrew S.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 38 (2021), Iss. 4 P.448
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2678 [Citations: 3]Managing VUCA Through Integrative Self-Management
Thinking Inside the Box: Applying the Theory of Karma to Make Boundary Judgements in Systemic Interventions
Sankaran, Shankar
Sankaran, Gita
2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52231-9_9 [Citations: 0]Second-order Learning in Developmental Evaluation
Introduction
Mitchell, Andrew
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99371-3_1 [Citations: 0]Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity
Apgar, Marina
Snijder, Mieke
Higdon, Grace Lyn
Szabo, Sylvia
The European Journal of Development Research, Vol. 35 (2023), Iss. 2 P.241
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-023-00577-x [Citations: 2]Second-order Learning in Developmental Evaluation
Second-order Learning Systems
Mitchell, Andrew
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99371-3_3 [Citations: 0]Managing complexity and uncertainty in agricultural innovation through adaptive project design and implementation
Bentley, Jeffery W.
Naziri, Diego
Prain, Gordon
Kikulwe, Enoch
Mayanja, Sarah
Devaux, André
Thiele, Graham
Development in Practice, Vol. 31 (2021), Iss. 2 P.198
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1832047 [Citations: 5]Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to Action Research and Action Learning
Using Transdisciplinary Action Research Toward Sustainable Management of Vineyard Management and Tourism in the Negev Highlands
Avriel-Avni, Noa
Holzer, Jen M.
Shachak, Moshe
Orenstein, Daniel E.
Groner, Elli E.
2018
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2642-1.ch012 [Citations: 0]Complexity theory, the capability approach, and the sustainability of development initiatives in education
Szekely, Emilia
Mason, Mark
Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 34 (2019), Iss. 5 P.669
https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1465999 [Citations: 13]Rethinking research partnerships: Evidence and the politics of participation in research partnerships for international development
Fransman, Jude
Newman, Kate
Journal of International Development, Vol. 31 (2019), Iss. 7 P.523
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3417 [Citations: 26]Achieving disability inclusive employment – Are the current approaches deep enough?
Shaw, Jackie
Wickenden, Mary
Thompson, Stephen
Mader, Philip
Journal of International Development, Vol. 34 (2022), Iss. 5 P.942
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3692 [Citations: 12]Systemic Participatory Action Research and Learning within Large-Scale Operational Programs to Eradicate Bonded Labor in India
Oosterhoff, Pauline
Burns, Danny
International Review of Qualitative Research, Vol. 13 (2020), Iss. 2 P.140
https://doi.org/10.1177/1940844720933235 [Citations: 1]Stewarding Sustainability Transformations
Introduction and Context: The State of the World
Kuenkel, Petra
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03691-1_1 [Citations: 0]Systems thinking and complexity science–informed evaluation frameworks: Assessment of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Agriculture and Food
Bustamante, María
Vidueira, Pablo
Baker, Lauren
New Directions for Evaluation, Vol. 2021 (2021), Iss. 170 P.81
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20455 [Citations: 6]Second-order Learning in Developmental Evaluation
Community-based Sustainability Initiatives as Learning Systems
Mitchell, Andrew
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99371-3_4 [Citations: 0]Rigour, timeliness, and trade-offs in research: experience from India’s Swachh Bharat Mission
Myers, Jamie
Vernon, Naomi
Chambers, Robert
Development in Practice, Vol. 34 (2024), Iss. 3 P.311
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2023.2270634 [Citations: 0]A Guide to Systems Research
Taking Action Using Systems Research
Sankaran, Shankar
2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0263-2_5 [Citations: 5]Seeing change in urban informal settlements with social network analysis
Kasper, Eric
Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 33 (2021), Iss. 1 P.151
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820953757 [Citations: 4]Participatory action research on alcoholism and bonded labour in times of prohibition in India
Oosterhoff, Pauline
Nanda, Rituu B
Educational Action Research, Vol. 30 (2022), Iss. 3 P.357
https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1813184 [Citations: 1]Stewarding Sustainability Transformations
Global Transformation as a Collective Leadership Challenge
Kuenkel, Petra
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03691-1_3 [Citations: 5]Systems approaches to public service delivery: methods and frameworks
Mansoor, Zahra
Williams, Martin J.
Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 44 (2024), Iss. 2 P.258
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000405 [Citations: 0]Beyond partnerships: embracing complexity to understand and improve research collaboration for global development
Fransman, Jude
Hall, Budd
Hayman, Rachel
Narayanan, Pradeep
Newman, Kate
Tandon, Rajesh
Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement, Vol. 42 (2021), Iss. 3 P.326
https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2021.1872507 [Citations: 16]Stewarding Sustainability Transformations
A Conceptual Architecture for Stewarding Sustainability Transformations
Kuenkel, Petra
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03691-1_7 [Citations: 1]Communication for Development
2. Using community-based action research as a participatory alternative in responding to violence in Tanzania
Percy-Smith, Barry
Bakta, Seraphina
Noske-Turner, Jessica
Mtenga, Georgina
Souza, Patricia Portela
2020
https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449968.002 [Citations: 0]Nonprofit Organizations and the Evaluation of Social Impact: A Research Program to Advance Theory and Practice
Benjamin, Lehn M.
Ebrahim, Alnoor
Gugerty, Mary Kay
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 52 (2023), Iss. 1_suppl P.313S
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221123590 [Citations: 9]International Child Protection
Conclusion: Towards Politics and Participation
Howard, Neil
2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78763-9_10 [Citations: 0]Innovations in Addressing Mental Health Needs in Humanitarian Settings: A Complexity Informed Action Research Case Study
Parrish-Sprowl, Susan
Parrish-Sprowl, John
Alajlouni, Samia
Frontiers in Communication, Vol. 5 (2020), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.601792 [Citations: 9]Advances in Human Factors in Robots, Unmanned Systems and Cybersecurity
Designing for the Unknown: Using Structured Analysis and Design Technique (SADT) to Create a Pilot Domain for a Shore Control Centre for Autonomous Ships
Rutledal, Dag
2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79997-7_10 [Citations: 1]Second-order Learning in Developmental Evaluation
Evaluating Complexity
Mitchell, Andrew
2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99371-3_2 [Citations: 0]In-migration, customary land tenure, and complexity: exploring the relationship between changing land tenure norms and differentiated migrant livelihoods in Brong Ahafo, Ghana
Sward, Jon
Population and Environment, Vol. 39 (2017), Iss. 1 P.87
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-017-0277-z [Citations: 10]Evolution and expansion of the One Health approach to promote sustainable and resilient health and well-being: A call to action
Mumford, Elizabeth L.
Martinez, Deniss J.
Tyance-Hassell, Karli
Cook, Alasdair
Hansen, Gail R.
Labonté, Ronald
Mazet, Jonna A. K.
Mumford, Elaine C.
Rizzo, David M.
Togami, Eri
Vreedzaam, Arioene
Parrish-Sprowl, John
Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 10 (2023), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1056459 [Citations: 17]