Attributing Development Impact
The qualitative impact protocol case book
James Copestake, Marlies Morsink, Fiona Remnant
Substantiating cause and effect is one of the great conundrums for those aiming to have a social impact, be they an NGO, social impact investment fund, or multinational corporation. All face the same quandary: how do you know whether, or how, you contributed to an observed social change? A wide range of impact evaluation methodologies exist to address this need, ranging from informal feedback loops to highly elaborate surveys. But generating useful and credible information in a timely and cost-effective way remains an elusive goal, particularly for organizations working in complex, rapidly evolving and diverse contexts.
Attributing Development Impact brings together responses to this challenge using an innovative impact evaluation approach called the Qualitative Impact Protocol (QuIP). This is a transparent, flexible and relatively simple set of guidelines for collecting, analysing and sharing feedback from intended beneficiaries about significant drivers of change in their lives. Innovative features include the use of ‘blindfolded’ interviewing to mitigate pro-project bias, and the application of a flexible coding system to make analysis and reporting faster and more transparent.
The QuIP has now been used in seven countries (Ethiopia, India, Malawi, Mexico, Tanzania, Uganda and UK) with activities to promote food security, rural livelihoods, factory working conditions, medical training, community empowerment and microcredit for house improvement. This book includes comprehensive ‘how to’ QuIP guidelines and practical insights based on case studies from these countries into how to address the numerous methodological challenges thrown up by impact evaluation.
Essential reading for evaluation specialists within NGOs, governments and donor agencies; social impact investors; community development practitioners; and researchers and students interested in evaluation methodologies.
Published: 2019
Pages: 192
eBook: 9781780447469
Paperback: 9781788530248
Hardback: 9781788530231
Attributing Development Impact brings together responses to this challenge using an innovative impact evaluation approach called the Qualitative Impact Protocol (QuIP). This is a transparent, flexible and relatively simple set of guidelines for collecting, analysing and sharing feedback from intended beneficiaries about significant drivers of change in their lives. Innovative features include the use of ‘blindfolded’ interviewing to mitigate pro-project bias, and the application of a flexible coding system to make analysis and reporting faster and more transparent.
The QuIP has now been used in seven countries (Ethiopia, India, Malawi, Mexico, Tanzania, Uganda and UK) with activities to promote food security, rural livelihoods, factory working conditions, medical training, community empowerment and microcredit for house improvement. This book includes comprehensive ‘how to’ QuIP guidelines and practical insights based on case studies from these countries into how to address the numerous methodological challenges thrown up by impact evaluation.
Essential reading for evaluation specialists within NGOs, governments and donor agencies; social impact investors; community development practitioners; and researchers and students interested in evaluation methodologies.
| Introduction | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Introducing the causal attribution challenge and the QuIP | |||
| 2. Comparing the QuIP with other approaches to development impact evaluation | |||
| 3. A deep dive into Diageo’s malt barley supply chain in Ethiopia | |||
| 4. Improving working conditions in the Mexican garment industry | |||
| 5. Exploring the social impact of housing microfinance in South India | |||
| 6. Faith-based rural poverty reduction in Uganda | |||
| 7. Harnessing agriculture for better nutritional outcomes in Southern Tanzania | |||
| 8. Placing volunteer educators: the Global Health Service Partnership | |||
| 9. Bending but not breaking? Adapting the QuIP for use with local authorities in England | |||
| 10. Conclusions: Insights gained and issues outstanding | |||
| Annnex: The QuIP Guidelines in full | |||
| Acknowledgements | |||
| Details of contributors | |||
| Index |
‘QuIP is well geared to do what it promises: it offers a simple, transparent method to deliver timely, cost-effective and credible causal attributions. And it is well grounded. The theory, history and case studies in this book show why we can trust that it can do what it says. QuIP is a really welcome contribution to methodology for causal inference.’
Nancy Cartwright, Distinguished Professor, UCSD; Professor of Philosophy, Durham University; Co-Director of CHESS, Durham University
'The assessment of complex interventions is defined by the need to make difficult trade-offs: time, money, talent and support always seem inadequate. But such pressures only intensify the need for good theory, breadth of experience, depth of commitment to professional standards, and giving stakeholders a reasoned basis on which to act. The strategies and cases outlined in this insightful book demonstrate how this can be realized in practice. The Qualitative Impact Protocol enables applied social science to do its job: to faithfully uphold accountability norms while generating sound and useable conclusions.'
Michael Woolcock, World Bank and Harvard University
James Copestake
James Copestake lectures in economics and international development at the University of Bath, UK. He has previously published research on the impact of microfinance in India, Southern Africa and Latin America.
Marlies Morsink
Marlies Morsink is Research Officer at the Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath. In the past year Marlies conducted action research into adapting QuIP for use by UK town councils.
Fiona Remnant
Fiona Remnant worked on research and development of the QuIP at the Centre for Development Studies before going on to co-found and run a non-profit research organisation, Bath Social & Development Research (BSDR), which continues to curate and develop the QuIP through consultancy and research.
Causal mapping for evaluators
Powell, Steve
Copestake, James
Remnant, Fiona
Evaluation, Vol. 30 (2024), Iss. 1 P.100
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231196601 [Citations: 6]Transforming access to care for serious mental disorders in slums (the TRANSFORM Project): rationale, design and protocol
Singh, Swaran P.
Jilka, Sagar
Abdulmalik, Jibril
Bouliotis, Georgios
Chadda, Rakesh
Egbokhare, Olayinka
Huque, Rumana
Hundt, Gillian Lewando
Iyer, Srividya
Jegede, Obafemi
Khera, Neeru
Lilford, Richard
Madan, Jason
Omigbodun, Akinyinka
Omigbodun, Olayinka
Raja, Tasneem
Read, Ursula M.
Siddiqi, Bulbul Ashraf
Sood, Mamta
Soron, Tanjir Rashid
Ahmed, Helal Uddin
BJPsych Open, Vol. 8 (2022), Iss. 6
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.584 [Citations: 9]When Do Development Projects Enhance Community Well-Being?
Woolcock, Michael
International Journal of Community Well-Being, Vol. 2 (2019), Iss. 2 P.81
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00031-z [Citations: 12]Mixed-methods impact evaluation in international development practice: distinguishing between quant-led and qual-led models
Copestake, James
Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 17 (2025), Iss. 1 P.1
https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2024.2351892 [Citations: 2]What Can We Learn From Qualitative Impact Evaluations About the Effectiveness of Lobby and Advocacy? A Meta-Evaluation of Dutch aid Programmes and Assessment Tool
Sharma Waddington, Hugh
Umezawa, Hikari
White, Howard
(2025)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X251314731 [Citations: 0]Case selection for robust generalisation: lessons from QuIP impact evaluation studies
Copestake, James
Development in Practice, Vol. 31 (2021), Iss. 2 P.150
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1828829 [Citations: 4]Measuring the women’s economic empowerment generated by impact investing; testing the QuIP method on an investment in Uganda’s cotton sector
Avard, Rebekah
Mukuru, Moses
Liesner, M. J.
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Vol. 12 (2022), Iss. 3 P.752
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.2012115 [Citations: 2]Developing and evaluating Compassionate Workplace Programs to promote health and wellbeing around serious illness, dying and loss in the workplace (EU-CoWork): a transdisciplinary, cross-national research project
Vanderstichelen, Steven
De Moortel, Deborah
Nielsen, Karina
Wegleitner, Klaus
Eneslätt, Malin
Sardiello, Tiziana
Martos, Daniela
Webster, Jennifer
Nikandrou, Irene
Delvaux, Ellen
Tishelman, Carol
Cohen, Joachim
Palliative Care and Social Practice, Vol. 18 (2024), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241281070 [Citations: 1]Spirituality and impact evaluation design: The case of an addiction recovery faith-based organisation in Argentina
Deneulin, Severine
Mitchell, Ann
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, Vol. 75 (2019), Iss. 4
https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i4.5482 [Citations: 0]A comprehensive framework for understanding microfinance performance evaluation methods
Sierra, Javier
Muriel-Patino, Victoria
Rodríguez-López, Fernando
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 11 (2024), Iss. 1
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03213-z [Citations: 0]From saviour to partner: reflections on relational needs-based organising in India
Lazarus, Joel
Mathur, Vibhor
Franchi, Maria
(2025) P.1
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2025.2517667 [Citations: 0]
You might also like:
