Lessons for African microfinance providers and regulators in the aftermath of COVID-19
This paper is concerned with microfinance in Africa post Covid-19, a crisis from which the continent is still recovering while new crises such as climate change challenges emerge. The resilience of the microfinance sector to crises must not only address operational weaknesses revealed by the pandemic, but also exploit the post-crisis potential to build resilience in areas such as digitalization and smallholder agriculture. New rules and regulations should target microfinance providers (MFPs) and enable them to quickly comply with new rules and those normally in force. This paper calls for the inclusion of all forms of MFPs, allowing for customized applications of policies and regulations. Moreover, measures for regulators include re-defining post-COVID-19 target groups, enhancing liquidity and MFP risk-based management, ensuring sustainability and best practices, activating prompt monitoring of the sector, and ensuring a consultative and coordinated culture. Measures for MFPs include increased micro-saving, avoiding subsidies, unlocking the full potential of smallholder farmers, a strong movement towards inclusive digital finance, product development, and partial movement towards crises-resistant, non-interest types of lending in countries with Muslim minorities.Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI) and Africa Financial Inclusion Policy Initiative (AfPI (2018) Digital Transformation of Microfinance and Digitization of Microfinance Services to Deepen Financial Inclusion in Africa [online], AFI, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia <https://www.afi-global.org/sites/default/files/publications/2018-08/AFI_AfPI_Special%20Report_AW_digital.pdf> [accessed 22 July 2021].
World Food Programme, (2002) ‘Risk of hunger pandemic as coronavirus set to almost double acute hunger by end of 2020’ [online], World Food Programme <https://insight.wfp.org/covid-19-will-almost-double-people-in-acute-hunger-by-end-of-2020-59df0c4a8072> [accessed 23 July 2021].
Blavy, R., Basu, A. and Yulek, M.A. (2004) ‘Microfinance in Africa:
CGAP (2020) Microfinance and COVID-19: A Framework for Regulatory Response [online] <https://www.cgap.org/research/publication/microfinance-and-COVID-19-framework-regulatory-response> [accessed 22 July 2021].
Convergences (2019) Microfinance Barometer 2019 [online] <http://www.convergences.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Microfinance-Barometer-2019_web-1.pdf> [accessed 23 July 2021].
Daniel, S. (2016) ‘Microfinance in Africa: opportunities for social entrepreneurs’, The African Business Review [online] <http://symbioticsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/tabr_may-june2013_55-57small.pdf> [accessed 24 July 2021].
MIX Market (2018) Global Outreach & Financial Performance Benchmark Report: 2017–2018 [online] <https://content.centerforfinancialinclusion.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/07/MIXMarket_GlobalOutreachFinancialBenchmarkReport_2017-2018.pdf> [accessed 6 January 2022].
S&P Global Ratings (2020) ‘Islamic finance 2020–2021: COVID-19 offers an opportunity for transformative developments’ [online] <https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research/articles/200615-islamic-finance-2020-2021-COVID-19-offers-an-opportunity-for-transformative-developments-11533355> [accessed 22 July 2021].
United Nations (2020a) United Nations Comprehensive Response to COVID-19: Saving Lives, Protecting Societies, Recovering Better [online] <https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/un_comprehensive_response_to_covid-19_june_2020.pdf> [accessed 22 July 2021].
United Nations (2020b) ‘Senior officials sound alarm over food insecurity, warning of potentially “biblical” famine, in briefings to Security Council’, 21 April [press release] <https://www.un.org/press/en/2020/sc14164.doc.htm> [accessed 5 January 2022].
WHO Africa (2022) ‘Over two-thirds of Africans exposed to virus which causes COVID-19: WHO study’ [online] <https://www.afro.who.int/news/over-two-thirds-africans-exposed-virus-which-causes-covid-19-who-study> [accessed 15 January 2022].
World Bank (2017) The Global Findex Database [online] <https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29510> [accessed 22 July 2021].
- Development impact bonds: learning from the Asháninka cocoa and coffee case in Peru
- Trade-off between outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa
- Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: A reality check and a warning
- Impact assessment of commodity standards: towards inclusive value chains
- What is cocoa sustainability? Mapping stakeholders’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial constellations of priorities