Crossfire: Microfinance can serve the very poor, but does it?
Microfinance was started as a tool to address extreme poverty, or even ‘to put poverty in a museum’. There is continuing debate about whether it can or cannot do this. Some argue that microfinance can and does alleviate or even ‘cure’ poverty, others that it has little or no impact, or even that it may even exacerbates poverty, particularly for the very poorest people. Two well-informed protagonists from South Asia discuss this issue. Rabeya Yasmin worked for Bangladesh Rehabilitation Assistance Committee (BRAC) in Bangladesh for 19 years, and was director of the well-known BRAC targeting the ultra poor (TUP) programme. She was educated at the University of Dhaka and at the IDS in Sussex, and is a member of the boards of several institutions in Bangladesh. Frances Sinha is a Director and co-founder of M-Cril, the international financial services and social business rating and research agency, based in Delhi. She is originally from the United Kingdom but has lived and worked for over thirty years in India, but also throughout South Asia and Africa.- Value chain financing: evidence from Zambia on smallholder access to finance for mechanization
- Developing agro-pastoral entrepreneurship: bundling blended finance and technology
- Building frontline market facilitators' capacity: the case of the ‘Integrating Very Poor Producers into Value Chains Field Guide’
- Boosting financial inclusion through social assistance reform: evidence-based approach in selecting a payment system
- Impact of COVID-19 on livestock exports from Somalia and the Horn of Africa