Tabs navigation
Guest Editorial: Does ‘microfinance’ mean what it used to?
What does ‘microfinance’ really mean in these days of financial inclusion and digital financial services? Is ‘financial inclusion’ simply a rebranding of ‘microfinance’, that is itself a rebranding of ‘microenterprise credit’?In the 1990s, microfinance became recognized as a set of methodologies that can make provision of financial services to the lower-income, ‘unbanked’ population viable and affordable. ‘Banking for the poor’ involved managing the costs and risks that made commercial banks avoid small financial transactions and informal enterprises – largely by passing them on to clients via solidarity groups and by using dynamic incentives such as short repayment periods and gradually increasing loan sizes. Initially, ‘microfinance’ and ‘microfinance institutions’ (MFIs) were virtually synonymous – both implying outside the formal financial system.
What does ‘microfinance’ really mean in these days of financial inclusion and digital financial services? Is ‘financial inclusion’ simply a rebranding of ‘microfinance’, that is itself a rebranding of ‘microenterprise credit’?
In the 1990s, microfinance became recognized as a set of methodologies that can make provision of financial services to the lower-income, ‘unbanked’ population viable and affordable. ‘Banking for the poor’ involved managing the costs and risks that made commercial banks avoid small financial transactions and informal enterprises – largely by passing them on to clients via solidarity groups and by using dynamic incentives such as short repayment periods and gradually increasing loan sizes. Initially, ‘microfinance’ and ‘microfinance institutions’ (MFIs) were virtually synonymous – both implying outside the formal financial system.
In the 1990s, microfinance became recognized as a set of methodologies that can make provision of financial services to the lower-income, ‘unbanked’ population viable and affordable. ‘Banking for the poor’ involved managing the costs and risks that made commercial banks avoid small financial transactions and informal enterprises – largely by passing them on to clients via solidarity groups and by using dynamic incentives such as short repayment periods and gradually increasing loan sizes. Initially, ‘microfinance’ and ‘microfinance institutions’ (MFIs) were virtually synonymous – both implying outside the formal financial system.
Carroll, L. (2007) Through the Looking Glass, London, UK: Penguin Classics.
Carroll, L. (2007) Through the Looking Glass, London, UK: Penguin Classics.
Carroll, L. (2007) Through the Looking Glass, London, UK: Penguin Classics.
Carroll, L. (2007) Through the Looking Glass, London, UK: Penguin Classics.
Tabs navigation
- Value chain financing: evidence from Zambia on smallholder access to finance for mechanization
- Developing agro-pastoral entrepreneurship: bundling blended finance and technology
- Building frontline market facilitators' capacity: the case of the ‘Integrating Very Poor Producers into Value Chains Field Guide’
- Boosting financial inclusion through social assistance reform: evidence-based approach in selecting a payment system
- Impact of COVID-19 on livestock exports from Somalia and the Horn of Africa
Browse our other journals
