Repositioning microfinance with impact investors: Codes of conduct and ‘social first’ MFIs

Paul Dileo

doi:10.3362/1755-1986.2011.031

Repositioning microfinance with impact investors: Codes of conduct and ‘social first’ MFIs

Investor interest in microfinance continues despite questions raised by recent repayment issues and by more sceptical assessments of social impact, but investor scrutiny has intensified. The industry can take the opportunity to more clearly articulate its social and financial objectives and how it will achieve them. An important part of this clarification will be to acknowledge that not all investors or microfinance institutions (MFIs) share the identical mix of social and financial objectives and on occasion choices among objectives will have to be made. Tools are becoming available that can make these priorities more transparent and predictable so as to more closely match the objectives and expectations of MFIs and investors. Codes of corporate conduct and minimum standards can provide a starting point for double-bottom-line investors. A differentiation between ‘financial first’ (FF) and ‘social first’ (SF) companies can give investors greater confidence that coinvestors, directors, and managers are fully aligned in pursuit of the same set of priorities. With this clarity, enhanced FF capital flows can have a major impact in achieving microfinance's social objectives through expanding scale and outreach in total numbers, while enhanced SF microfinance will push the envelope and set the evolving standard on improving microfinance's effectiveness in achieving its social objectives.

Chu, M. (2011) ‘Microfinance today and tomorrow’, Microfinance: Inclusion and Sustainable Business, Harvard Business School, 22 February 2011

Freireich, J. and Fulton, K. (2009) Investing for Social and Environmental Impact, Monitor Institute, www.monitorinstitute.com www.monitorinstitute.com

Gonzalez, A. (2010) ‘Microfinance Synergies and Trade-offs: Social versus Financial Performance Outcomes in 2008’, MIX Data Brief # 7 [website] <www.themix.org≯ [accessed 20 October 2011]. www.themix.org

Gonzalez, A. (2011) ‘Defining Responsible Financial Performance: (1) how to think about growth; (2) the role of profits; (3) understanding efficiency’ [website], May 2011, <www.themix.org≯ [accessed 20 October 2011]. www.themix.org

Guarneri, M. and Spaggiari, L. (2010) ‘Findings from social ratings: (1) Social and financial performance’; (2) ‘Poverty Outreach and Financial Exclusion’; (3) ‘Consumer Protection and Social Responsibility’, Microfinanza Rating, www.microfinanzarating.com www.microfinanzarating.com

Imp-Act Consortium/MicroSave (2011) Governance: Integrating SPM into Microfinance Capacity Building [website] <http://spmresourcecentre.net/iprc/assets/File/Governance_guidance_note.pdf= [accessed 20 October 2011]. http://spmresourcecentre.net/iprc/assets/File/Governance_guidance_note.pdf

J.P. Morgan Global Research (2010) Impact Investments: an Emerging Market Class, 29 November 2010 www.morganmarkets.com www.morganmarkets.com

J.P. Morgan Global Research and CGAP (2011) Discovering Limits: Microfinance Valuation Survey 2011, 14 July 2011, www.morganmarkets.com www.morganmarkets.com

Mollner, T. (forthcoming) The Love Skill: Mastering the Seven Layers of Maturity.

Prahalad, C.K. (2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Rivlin, G. (2010) Broke, USA, Harper Business, New York.

World Microfinance Forum Geneva (2008) Symposium Special Issue: Is It Fair to do Business with the Poor? Report on the Debate between Muhammad Yunus and Michael Chu, Geneva, 1-2 October 2008.

Yunus, M. (2007) Creating a World without Poverty, Public Affairs, New York.