Collaborative market development as a propoor and pro-environmental strategy

Anne-Marie Tremblay; Andreas Neef

doi:10.3362/1755-1986.2009.021

Collaborative market development as a propoor and pro-environmental strategy

Litchi growers of the Hmong ethnic minority in hillsides of northern Thailand have received consistently low prices for their fresh litchi fruits in past years. Concerns over sustainable livelihoods and land use have prompted a group of academics from University of Hohenheim, Germany, and two institutes from Chiang Mai University, Thailand, to collaborate and invite farmers to initiate talks with a large supermarket chain that aims to buy directly from growers, thus bypassing middlemen and guaranteeing higher prices. The prospect of higher financial benefits has incited a group of farmers from several villages to comply with Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) guidelines, reduce the use of hazardous agrochemicals, form a cooperative and adapt cultivation methods. Drawing on qualitative research methods and an action-research approach, this pilot case study provides key insights into how collaboration between academics, smallholder farmers and large business actors can be fostered towards market relationships that are economically, socially and environmentally sustainable.

Caniels, M. C. J. and Romijn, H. A. (2008) ‘Strategic niche management: Towards a policy tool for sustainable development’, Technology Analysis & Strategy Management, 20(2): 245-266.

Carson D., Gilmore A., Perry C. and Gronhaug, K. (2001) Qualitative Marketing Research, Sage publications, London.

Dunne, A. J. (2008) ‘The impact of an organization's collaborative capacity on its ability to engage its supply chain partners’, British Food Journal, 110(4/5): 361-375.

Engel, P. G. H. (1997) The Social Organization of Innovation: A Focus on Stakeholder Interaction, Royal Tropical Institute, The Netherlands.

Eyford, H. and Eyford, G. (1995) Involving Culture: A FieldWorkers’ Guide to Culturally Sensitive Development, Canadian International Development Agency, UNESCO, Paris, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001204/120456e0.pdf http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001204/120456e0.pdf

Fredericks, E. (2005) ‘Cross-functional involvement in new product development: A resource dependency and human capital perspective’, Qualitative Market Research, 8(3): 327-339.

Hoffmann, V., Probst, K. and Christinck, A. (2007) ‘Farmers and researchers: How can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development?’, Agriculture and Human Values, 24: 355-368.

Huizer, G. (1997) Participatory Action Research and People's Participation: Introduction and Case Studies, Sustainable Development Department, FAO, www.fao.org/sd/PPdirect/PPre0023.htm www.fao.org/sd/PPdirect/PPre0023.htm

IAASTD (2008) Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, IAASTD, Washington, DC, www.agassessment.org/docs/IAASTD_EXEC_SUMMARY_JAN_2008.pdf www.agassessment.org/docs/IAASTD_EXEC_SUMMARY_JAN_2008.pdf

Konefal, J., Mascarenha, M., and Hatanak, M. (2005) ‘Governance in the global agro-food system: Backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains’, Agriculture and Human Values, 22: 291-302.

Kottila, M.-R. and Ronni, P. (2008) ‘Collaboration and trust in two organic food chains’, British Food Journal, 110(4/5): 376-394.

Leeuwis, C. with contributions from A. van den Ban (2004) Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension, 3rd edition, Blackwell Science, Oxford.

May, A., Shaw, H., Orlando, Y. and Boxelaar, L. (2003) Developing Social Capability through Participatory Action Research - The Application and Evaluation of RAAKS, The Regional Institute Ltd, www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2003/nonrefereed/106maya.htm www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2003/nonrefereed/106maya.htm

Mikkola, M. (2008) ‘Coordinative structures and development of food supply chains’, British Food Journal, 110(2): 189-205.

Neef, A., Elstner, P., Sangkapitux, C., Chamsai, L., Bollen, A. and Kitchaicharoen, J. (2005) ‘Diversity of water management systems: Examples from Hmong and Thai communities in Mae Sa watershed, northern Thailand’, Mountain Research and Development, 25(1): 20-24.

Neef, A., Heidhues, F. and Stahr, K. (2006) ‘Participatory and integrated research in mountainous regions of Thailand and Vietnam: Approaches and lessons learned’, Journal of Mountain Science, 3(4): 305-324.

Nill, J. and Kemp, R. (2009) ‘Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?’, Research Policy, 38: 668-680.

OAE (no date), Office of Agricultural Economics, Thailand, www.oae.go.th. www.oae.go.th

Oakley, P. (1991) Projects with People: The Practice of Participation in Rural Development, FAO, ILO Publisher, Geneva.

Olsen, J. R., Harmsen, H. and Friis, A. (2008) ‘Product development alliances: factors influencing formation and success’, British Food Journal, 110(4/5): 430-443.

Schreinemachers, P., Praneetvatakul, S., Sirijinda, A. and Berger, T. (2008) Agricultural Statistics of the Mae Sa Watershed Area: Thailand 2006, The Uplands Program, Chiang Mai.

Silverman, D. (2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, 2nd edition, Sage Publications, London.

Silverman, D. (ed.) (2004) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 2nd edition, Sage Publications, London.

Trienekens, J., van Uffelen, R., Debaire, J. and Omta, O. (2008) ‘Assessment of innovation and performance in the fruit chain’, British Food Journal, 110(1): 98-127.

World Bank (2006) Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Yin, R. K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd editon, Sage publications, London.