Mapping the market: participatory market-chain development in practice
Market mapping is an approach to describe the market systems involving small-scale producers: the value chain, together with support services and the business environment affecting the chain. This article describes a participatory approach to market-chain development that has evolvedaround market mapping processes, with the example given of the market map for aloe in Kenya. Practical Action has found a number of processes are effective in ensuring positive engagaement and outcomes. For example, 'market opportunity groups' are formed to represent and empower producers,
enabling them to negotiate with other market chain actors with greater confidence. Interest forums, on the other hand, include decision-makers with influence at local, national and sometimes international levels. Four short case studies of market-chain development work in Zimbabwe, Kenya,
Peru and Sudan are presented, which demonstrate how these elements can assist in participatory market-chain analysis, making the move from analysis to action more effective.
around market mapping processes, with the example given of the market map for aloe in Kenya. Practical Action has found a number of processes are effective in ensuring positive engagaement and outcomes. For example, 'market opportunity groups' are formed to represent and empower producers,
enabling them to negotiate with other market chain actors with greater confidence. Interest forums, on the other hand, include decision-makers with influence at local, national and sometimes international levels. Four short case studies of market-chain development work in Zimbabwe, Kenya,
Peru and Sudan are presented, which demonstrate how these elements can assist in participatory market-chain analysis, making the move from analysis to action more effective.
On the susceptibility and vulnerability of agricultural value chains to COVID-19
Morton, John
World Development, Vol. 136 (2020), Iss. P.105132
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105132 [Citations: 26]Managing stakeholder knowledge for the evaluation of innovation systems in the face of climate change
Nikas, Alexandros
Doukas, Haris
Lieu, Jenny
Alvarez Tinoco, Rocío
Charisopoulos, Vasileios
van der Gaast, Wytze
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 (2017), Iss. 5 P.1013
https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0006 [Citations: 34]Encouraging system learning in two poultry subsectors
van Mierlo, Barbara
Janssen, Arni
Leenstra, Ferry
van Weeghel, Ellen
Agricultural Systems, Vol. 115 (2013), Iss. P.29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.10.002 [Citations: 28]California's regulatory forest carbon market: Viability for northeast landowners
Kerchner, Charles D.
Keeton, William S.
Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 50 (2015), Iss. P.70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.005 [Citations: 48]Understanding and Analysis: The California Air Resources Board Forest Offset Protocol
Challenging Issues
Marland, Eric
Domke, Grant
Hoyle, Jason
Marland, Gregg
Bates, Laurel
Helms, Alex
Jones, Benjamin
Kowalczyk, Tamara
Ruseva, Tatyana B.
Szymanski, Celina
2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52434-4_5 [Citations: 0]Barriers and opportunities to bioenergy transitions: An integrated, multi-level perspective analysis of biogas uptake in Bali
Bößner, Stefan
Devisscher, Tahia
Suljada, Timothy
Ismail, Cynthia J.
Sari, Auditya
Mondamina, Novelita W.
Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 122 (2019), Iss. P.457
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.002 [Citations: 25]Making sense of the market: Assessing the participatory market chain approach to aquaculture value chain development in Nepal and Bangladesh
Khondker, Murshed-e-Jahan
Ali, Hazrat
Upraity, Varsha
Gurung, Shailesh
Dhar, Goutam Chandra
Belton, Ben
Aquaculture, Vol. 493 (2018), Iss. P.395
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.06.003 [Citations: 12]Making Markets - and Institutions - Work for the Poor�Märkte - und Institutionen - für die Armen zugänglich machen�Faire fonctionner les marchés - et les institutions - au bénéfice des pauvres
Poole, Nigel
EuroChoices, Vol. 8 (2009), Iss. 1 P.40
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2009.00120.x [Citations: 1]Facilitating the dairy market system in Nepal: A participatory approach
Morcrette, Alexis
Rai, Sharad
Food Chain, Vol. 1 (2011), Iss. 2 P.156
https://doi.org/10.3362/2046-1887.2011.015 [Citations: 0]Promoting sustainable energy technology transfers to developing countries through the CDM
van der Gaast, Wytze
Begg, Katherine
Flamos, Alexandros
Applied Energy, Vol. 86 (2009), Iss. 2 P.230
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.03.009 [Citations: 71]Policy choices for Vietnam's craft villages: Value chain or livelihood approach?
Knorringa, Peter
Huong, Nguyen Thi Minh
Enterprise Development and Microfinance, Vol. 22 (2011), Iss. 3 P.184
https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.2011.022 [Citations: 0]Evaluating Consistency in Environmental Policy Mixes through Policy, Stakeholder, and Contextual Interactions
Lieu, Jenny
Spyridaki, Niki
Alvarez-Tinoco, Rocio
van der Gaast, Wytze
Tuerk, Andreas
van Vliet, Oscar
Sustainability, Vol. 10 (2018), Iss. 6 P.1896
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061896 [Citations: 22]Dairy supply chain in Southern Brazil: barriers to competitiveness
Beber, Caetano Luiz
Carpio, Andres Fabricio Ruales
Almadani, Mohamad Isam
Theuvsen, Ludwig
International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Vol. 22 (2019), Iss. 5 P.651
https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2018.0091 [Citations: 10]Conceptual framework for value chain analysis for poverty alleviation among smallholder farmers
Jordaan, Henry
Grové, Bennie
Backeberg, Gerhard R.
Agrekon, Vol. 53 (2014), Iss. 1 P.1
https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2014.887903 [Citations: 17]- Development impact bonds: learning from the Asháninka cocoa and coffee case in Peru
- Trade-off between outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa
- Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: A reality check and a warning
- Impact assessment of commodity standards: towards inclusive value chains
- What is cocoa sustainability? Mapping stakeholders’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial constellations of priorities
Browse our other journals
