manage to participate in microfinance institutions are compared with those who never have. The article shows that the ultra poor who participate in MFIs are better off than those who never participated, and that they also borrow more from informal sources. The intensity of microcredit borrowing
is lower among the very poor who participate in MFIs compared to MFI participants coming from other poverty groups.Given that reaching the very poor remains an important challenge for the global microfinance industry, a better understanding of the overall financial market participation
of the very poor is important for guiding policy and practice.
Reputation as Insurance? Extending the Range of Financial Services for the Poor
(2003)https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.368860 [Citations: 0]
How Effective is a Big Push to the Small? Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment
World Development, Vol. 41 (2013), Iss. P.168https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.021 [Citations: 7]
Cost effectiveness or serving the poor? Factors determining program placement of NGOs in Bangladesh
Nabin, Munirul H.
Economic Modelling, Vol. 69 (2018), Iss. P.281https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.10.001 [Citations: 6]
- Development impact bonds: learning from the Asháninka cocoa and coffee case in Peru
- Trade-off between outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa
- Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: A reality check and a warning
- What is cocoa sustainability? Mapping stakeholders’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial constellations of priorities
- Impact assessment of commodity standards: towards inclusive value chains