The market-based approach to enterprise assistance—an evaluation of the World Bank's market development grant funds
When technical assistance to enterprise development is justified then instead of subsidized central facilities, which have often been ineffective, the assistance should aim to develop the market for businessknow-how. Grants targeted to firms that want to buy business services are more likely to achieve this aim because they can stimulate a competitive response from independent providers of services. 'Matching
grant funds' have been used to develop the market by targeting small, efficient firms with the potential for growth, but lacking information or know-how. The World Bank has completed and evaluated eight
projects of this type. The net impact of the eight projects, as described in this article, has, however, been uncertain. While their direct output benefit (in terms of increased exports or sales) appears
to have been good, sustainability and development impact seem to have been weak. Operating costs have in some cases been high and implementation has been delayed, raising questions about their ability to
mobilize the services market. In one case, a project in Mauritius, the first evaluation claimed outstanding results in terms of rapid response and increased output, but a subsequent study shed doubt on
the market impact, showing that most firms would have purchased the business service anyway, without the grant. For such programmes, emphasis should not be on the growth of exports and output, but on
the growth of the market for services. Grant funds have to be carefully justified in terms of development impact, and better designed, if they are to be cost-effective and to achieve their potential market-making
objective.
know-how. Grants targeted to firms that want to buy business services are more likely to achieve this aim because they can stimulate a competitive response from independent providers of services. 'Matching
grant funds' have been used to develop the market by targeting small, efficient firms with the potential for growth, but lacking information or know-how. The World Bank has completed and evaluated eight
projects of this type. The net impact of the eight projects, as described in this article, has, however, been uncertain. While their direct output benefit (in terms of increased exports or sales) appears
to have been good, sustainability and development impact seem to have been weak. Operating costs have in some cases been high and implementation has been delayed, raising questions about their ability to
mobilize the services market. In one case, a project in Mauritius, the first evaluation claimed outstanding results in terms of rapid response and increased output, but a subsequent study shed doubt on
the market impact, showing that most firms would have purchased the business service anyway, without the grant. For such programmes, emphasis should not be on the growth of exports and output, but on
the growth of the market for services. Grant funds have to be carefully justified in terms of development impact, and better designed, if they are to be cost-effective and to achieve their potential market-making
objective.
The additionality impact of a matching grant programme for small firms: experimental evidence from Yemen
McKenzie, David
Assaf, Nabila
Cusolito, Ana Paula
Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 9 (2017), Iss. 1 P.1
https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2016.1231703 [Citations: 14]Financial Challenges Facing Urban SMEs under Financial Sector Liberalization in Ghana
Tagoe, Noel
Nyarko, Ernest
Anuwa-Amarh, Ebenezer
Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 43 (2005), Iss. 3 P.331
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00140.x [Citations: 71]Back in Business: Private Sector Development for Poverty Reduction in Norwegian Aid
Villanger, Espen
Forum for Development Studies, Vol. 43 (2016), Iss. 2 P.333
https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2015.1089318 [Citations: 4]Learning from the experiments that never happened: Lessons from trying to conduct randomized evaluations of matching grant programs in Africa
Campos, Francisco
Coville, Aidan
Fernandes, Ana M.
Goldstein, Markus
McKenzie, David
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 33 (2014), Iss. P.4
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2013.12.007 [Citations: 5]- Value chain financing: evidence from Zambia on smallholder access to finance for mechanization
- Developing agro-pastoral entrepreneurship: bundling blended finance and technology
- Building frontline market facilitators' capacity: the case of the ‘Integrating Very Poor Producers into Value Chains Field Guide’
- Boosting financial inclusion through social assistance reform: evidence-based approach in selecting a payment system
- Impact of COVID-19 on livestock exports from Somalia and the Horn of Africa