Tabs navigation
From event to process: current trends in microfinance impact assessment
Measuring the impact of microfinance programmes on client businesses and proving that changes can be attributed to the intervention are notoriously difficult. In response to this, some argue that clientloyalty is sufficient evidence of client satisfaction and of positive impact, and that further measurement is unnecessary. This article argues against this: impact assessment is necessary not only to demonstrate
to donors that their interventions are having a positive impact, but also to provide information that allows MFIs to improve their services, and thus improve impact. The article describes the move away
from donor-led impact events, towards more practitioner-focused processes, and outlines the experience of individual organizations and international projects, most notably the AIMS project, in developing
impact assessment that is more responsive to practitioner needs. Practitioner-focused impact assessment looks at how impact information can feed into management and product design processes, and provide
frequent and timely information. Many challenges remain, particularly in terms of ensuring a diversity of approaches and applications for IA, and the inclusion of a range of stakeholders in defining what
should be included in the impact assessment process, and in the analysis and use of results. These challenges are the focus of a Ford Foundation sponsored action-research programme, Imp-Act.
Measuring the impact of microfinance programmes on client businesses and proving that changes can be attributed to the intervention are notoriously difficult. In response to this, some argue that client
loyalty is sufficient evidence of client satisfaction and of positive impact, and that further measurement is unnecessary. This article argues against this: impact assessment is necessary not only to demonstrate
to donors that their interventions are having a positive impact, but also to provide information that allows MFIs to improve their services, and thus improve impact. The article describes the move away
from donor-led impact events, towards more practitioner-focused processes, and outlines the experience of individual organizations and international projects, most notably the AIMS project, in developing
impact assessment that is more responsive to practitioner needs. Practitioner-focused impact assessment looks at how impact information can feed into management and product design processes, and provide
frequent and timely information. Many challenges remain, particularly in terms of ensuring a diversity of approaches and applications for IA, and the inclusion of a range of stakeholders in defining what
should be included in the impact assessment process, and in the analysis and use of results. These challenges are the focus of a Ford Foundation sponsored action-research programme, Imp-Act.
loyalty is sufficient evidence of client satisfaction and of positive impact, and that further measurement is unnecessary. This article argues against this: impact assessment is necessary not only to demonstrate
to donors that their interventions are having a positive impact, but also to provide information that allows MFIs to improve their services, and thus improve impact. The article describes the move away
from donor-led impact events, towards more practitioner-focused processes, and outlines the experience of individual organizations and international projects, most notably the AIMS project, in developing
impact assessment that is more responsive to practitioner needs. Practitioner-focused impact assessment looks at how impact information can feed into management and product design processes, and provide
frequent and timely information. Many challenges remain, particularly in terms of ensuring a diversity of approaches and applications for IA, and the inclusion of a range of stakeholders in defining what
should be included in the impact assessment process, and in the analysis and use of results. These challenges are the focus of a Ford Foundation sponsored action-research programme, Imp-Act.
Mainstreaming Microfinance: Social Performance Management or Mission Drift?
Copestake, James
World Development, Vol. 35 (2007), Iss. 10 P.1721
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.004 [Citations: 211]Microfinance, Poverty and Social Performance:Overview
Simanowitz, Anton
IDS Bulletin, Vol. 34 (2003), Iss. 4 P.1
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2003.tb00085.x [Citations: 10]Part II: Institutionalising Social Performance 5. Simple Standards or Burgeoning Benchmarks? Institutionalising Social Performance Monitoring, Assessment and Auditing of Microfinance
Copestake, James
IDS Bulletin, Vol. 34 (2003), Iss. 4 P.54
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2003.tb00090.x [Citations: 7]Food Security and Sustainability
MicroFinancial Services and Risk Management for Food Security: A Vulnerable Household Perspective
Navare, Jyoti
2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40790-6_7 [Citations: 0]Finance and Economy for Society: Integrating Sustainability
Exploring New Ways to Assess the Impact of Microfinance: What Role for the Capability Approach?
Diani, Asmae
Brabet, Julienne
2016
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-905920160000011011 [Citations: 0]Service-learning to foster microenterprise development in Mexico
Mungaray-Lagarda, Alejandro
Osorio-Novela, Germán
Ramírez-Angulo, Natanael
Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, Vol. 12 (2022), Iss. 1 P.50
https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-05-2020-0087 [Citations: 2]Tabs navigation
- Development impact bonds: learning from the Asháninka cocoa and coffee case in Peru
- Trade-off between outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa
- Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: A reality check and a warning
- Impact assessment of commodity standards: towards inclusive value chains
- What is cocoa sustainability? Mapping stakeholders’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial constellations of priorities
Browse our other journals
