Tabs navigation
Business Support Centres in the transition economies - progress with the wrong model?
During the 1990s networks of Business Support Centres (BSCs) were promoted in the transition economies of eastern Europe, aimed at supporting business start-ups and microenterprises. The funding came fromwestern donor agencies, who were convinced that support services within local government were ineffective, and instead funded private-sector BSCs. This article argues that an essentially neo-liberal ideology
underpinned the BSCs' design, before going on to point out some of the main drawbacks and opportunity costs which followed from this approach. Now that funding is being withdrawn, the BSCs are not being
adopted by local government, and they are obliged to fund themselves with consultancies from large businesses. It is argued that the 'tiger economies' provide examples of successful state involvement in
SME development, a model which was ignored, but would have been more appropriate in Central and Eastern Europe.
During the 1990s networks of Business Support Centres (BSCs) were promoted in the transition economies of eastern Europe, aimed at supporting business start-ups and microenterprises. The funding came from
western donor agencies, who were convinced that support services within local government were ineffective, and instead funded private-sector BSCs. This article argues that an essentially neo-liberal ideology
underpinned the BSCs' design, before going on to point out some of the main drawbacks and opportunity costs which followed from this approach. Now that funding is being withdrawn, the BSCs are not being
adopted by local government, and they are obliged to fund themselves with consultancies from large businesses. It is argued that the 'tiger economies' provide examples of successful state involvement in
SME development, a model which was ignored, but would have been more appropriate in Central and Eastern Europe.
western donor agencies, who were convinced that support services within local government were ineffective, and instead funded private-sector BSCs. This article argues that an essentially neo-liberal ideology
underpinned the BSCs' design, before going on to point out some of the main drawbacks and opportunity costs which followed from this approach. Now that funding is being withdrawn, the BSCs are not being
adopted by local government, and they are obliged to fund themselves with consultancies from large businesses. It is argued that the 'tiger economies' provide examples of successful state involvement in
SME development, a model which was ignored, but would have been more appropriate in Central and Eastern Europe.
Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe
Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Hungary
Welter, Friederike
2002
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57460-3_7 [Citations: 1]Between petty corruption and criminal extortion: How entrepreneurs in Bulgaria and Romania operate within a devil’s circle
Vorley, Tim
Williams, Nick
International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, Vol. 34 (2016), Iss. 6 P.797
https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615590464 [Citations: 25]Tabs navigation
- Value chain financing: evidence from Zambia on smallholder access to finance for mechanization
- Developing agro-pastoral entrepreneurship: bundling blended finance and technology
- Boosting financial inclusion through social assistance reform: evidence-based approach in selecting a payment system
- Building frontline market facilitators' capacity: the case of the ‘Integrating Very Poor Producers into Value Chains Field Guide’
- Impact of COVID-19 on livestock exports from Somalia and the Horn of Africa
Browse our other journals
